宇's profile笨笨的寝寝PhotosBlogListsMore Tools Help

宇 龚

总是能心安理得地将自己置于喧闹街市中安静的角落;
却也总是能无庸置疑地将自己于夜深人静中放逐内心的呼喊.
总是能用华丽繁嚣的辞藻奠基着我那时而鸣空时而沉寂的情感,
却也总是能用朴实白话的言辞描述着我时而清醒时而迷茫的心情.
Lists

笨笨的寝寝

星雨夜微寒,共饮一杯无?
December 14

Samuelson say bye to the world

如果在20世纪的经济学家里只选出一位宗师,我以为非萨缪尔森莫属。今天他离世了,94岁。
 
萨缪尔森,几乎改写了经济学的每一个领域。事实上,今天世上的经济学家,大概已经没有太多人能够记得萨缪尔森之前经济学是什么样子,可以说是萨缪尔森,奠定了经济学在社会科学中独一无二的地位,有了萨缪尔森,才有了现在大家所知道的经济学。在这个意义上,每个后来的经济学家,都是萨缪尔森的学生,就更不要说有多少人是捧着他的那本经典的《经济学》走进这个学科的了。
 
当然,萨缪尔森的高峰是在战后直到肯尼迪-约翰逊时期,只是他的洞见和理论直到今天还在影响着政策辩论。就说人民币汇率吧,有谁在讨论人民币汇率的时候能不引用巴拉萨-萨缪尔森效应呢?简单的说,萨缪尔森的理论预言了,一个快速工业化,经济高速增长的国家,会发生真实汇率的升值。其引申是,这样的国家如果不发生名义升值,那就必然会发生通货膨胀。人民银行,恐怕在可以未来的将来,都必须和这个理论的预言战斗。这是一个六十年代的理论,但直到今天,仍然是关于长期均衡真实汇率最重要的理论之一。
 
萨缪尔森,千古。

In a career that spanned seven decades, he transformed his field, influenced millions of students and turned MIT into an economics powerhouse.
Greg Frost, MIT News Office
December 13, 2009

MIT economist Paul A. Samuelson, the Nobel laureate whose mathematical analysis provided the foundation on which modern economics is built and whose textbook influenced generations of students, died today at his home in Belmont, Mass. He was 94.

Samuelson, an Institute Professor Emeritus and Gordon Y Billard Fellow at MIT, was one of the world’s leading economists for more than half a century. When he became the first American to win the Nobel Memorial Prize in economics in 1970, a year after the prize was created, the Swedish Royal Academy said that he “has done more than any other contemporary economist to raise the level of scientific analysis in economic theory.”

Twenty-six years later, in 1996, when he was awarded a National Medal of Science, America’s top science honor, President Bill Clinton praised his “fundamental contributions to economic science, specifically general equilibrium theory and macroeconomics, and to economic education and policy over a period of 60 years.”

Samuelson’s contributions to the field were so numerous and fundamental that they lend themselves to description in more general terms. "If you did a time and motion study of what any modern economist does at work, you would find that an enormous proportion of standard mental devices trace back to Paul Samuelson's long lifetime of research,” said MIT Institute Professor Emeritus Robert Solow. “What I can add about my beloved friend of 60 years is that he had a marvelous intuition about how a market economy had to be. 'It must work like this,' he would say. 'Now all we have to do is prove it.' There was no one like him."

Samuelson was instrumental in bringing the MIT Department of Economics, which did not train graduate students when he joined it in 1940, to its current stature as a world-renowned research and teaching institution. Reflecting on this at a dinner in 1991 celebrating the establishment of the department’s Samuelson Chair in Economics, Samuelson referred to the department’s development as a “scientific miracle.” Admonishing the audience not to believe “that this was my handiwork alone,” he said that the department, from 1941 to 1960, “went from being a mediocre service department to becoming No. 1 on all foundations’ ranking of departments.” In fact, he quipped, by the mid-1960s the U.S. Department of Justice’s antitrust division was starting to fret about MIT's garnering of most of the National Science Foundation fellowships awarded in economics.

“Two factors explain our success,” Samuelson wrote in 2000. “One, MIT's renaissance after World War II as a federally supported research resource. Two, the mathematical revolution in macro- and micro-economic theory and statistics: this was overdue and inevitable — MIT was the logical place for it to flourish.”

As MIT President Susan Hockfield framed it, “Paul Samuelson transformed everything he touched: the theoretical foundations of his field, the way economics was taught around the world, the ethos and stature of his department, the investment practices of MIT, and the lives of his colleagues and students. Intellectually and personally, his vision created the intensely collaborative culture of MIT's Department of Economics, and in everything he did, he represented the very best of MIT.”

‘One of the giants’

Samuelson produced the best-selling economics text of all time, Economics: An Introductory Analysis. First published in 1948 and originally prepared for MIT’s then-mandatory undergraduate economics course, Samuelson’s textbook was the first to explain the principles of Keynesian economics to beginning economics students. It has been translated into 40 languages, and is now in its 19th edition in English. The textbook has sold nearly four million copies over a span of 60 years.  

Samuelson’s textbook influenced generations of students, said James Poterba, MIT’s Mitsui Professor of Economics and former head of MIT’s Department of Economics. He noted that for decades, future scholars, policy-makers, and business executives were introduced to contemporary economics by Samuelson’s book. “He leaves an immense legacy, as a researcher and a teacher, as one of the giants on whose shoulders every contemporary economist stands,” Poterba said.  

In the area of policy, Samuelson never held a major government post but, true to his belief that economists should be involved in social issues, he served as an adviser to Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson and was a consultant to government, foundations and companies. He also commented frequently on economic policy matters and for years made his views known to the public through a column in Newsweek magazine.

Often referred to as an economist’s economist, Samuelson once wrote: “In this age of specialization, I sometimes think of myself as the last ‘generalist’ in economics. My interests range from mathematical economics to current financial journalism.”

Samuelson continued to work long after his official retirement in 1985, arriving at his office at MIT regularly and remaining an active member of the department. Displaying his well-known wit, he told the gathering celebrating the Samuelson Chair, “That’s what I would like to do until the end of time — to go on scribbling my articles on the third floor of the Sloan Building, in between playing tennis and drinking coffee at my other study in the Concord Avenue branch of Burger King.”

Ricardo Caballero, the Ford International Professor of Economics and head of MIT’s Department of Economics, said Samuelson remained a central figure in all the department’s gatherings until the very end.

“He always had the last — and the first — word, and deservedly so,” Caballero said. “We will miss him and his unmatched wit very much, but his intellectual legacy is enormous and perennial. The world is different today because he was with us for many years."

International acclaim


Paul Anthony Samuelson was born in Gary, Ind., on May 15, 1915. He received a BS from the University of Chicago in 1935, an MA in 1936 from Harvard University and the PhD, with a David A. Wells Prize, from Harvard in 1941. He was an early Junior Fellow at the Harvard Society of Fellows.

He was appointed an assistant professor of economics at MIT in 1940, associate professor in 1944, and full professor in 1947. In 1966, he was named Institute Professor, MIT’s highest faculty honor.

Even as a graduate student at Harvard, Samuelson won international acclaim and made significant contributions to economic theory. Confronted by contradictions, overlaps and fallacies in the classical language of economics, he sought unification — and clarification — in mathematics.

In his first major work, Foundations of Economic Analysis (1947), which was also his PhD thesis, he told economists that they had been practicing “mental gymnastics of a particularly depraved type,” and were like “highly trained athletes who never ran a race.” He did not claim mathematics would cure the ills of economic analysis, but he did insist that mathematics was essential.

The Swedish Royal Academy said in its Nobel citation that in this first book and in a large number of articles as well, Samuelson had “rewritten considerable parts of central economic theory and has in several areas achieved results which now rank among the classical theories of economics.”

In his work on the theory of balance between prices and supply and demand, the academy said, Samuelson had succeeded in “formulating the theory in mathematical terms. The matter of approach, how to handle this problem, is what his contribution was.”

As an adviser to Kennedy and Johnson, Samuelson advocated tax cuts and the war on poverty. In 1974, he was one of 21 economists to attend President Gerald Ford’s two-day “inflation summit conference.” There, he said America had been stricken with a bad case of “stagflation” — the toxic mix of high unemployment and high inflation over long periods of time.

In addition to receiving the Nobel Prize and National Medal of Science, Samuelson was the inaugural winner of the John Bates Clark Medal, the American Economic Association's award for the best American economist under the age of 40, in 1947. He served as president of the American Economic Association and the Econometric Society. He was the author of hundreds of articles in professional journals and magazines, and served as associate editor and a member of the advisory and editorial boards of several professional journals. The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson have been published in five volumes, containing about 400 articles, by the MIT Press. Another 200 papers will be published in volumes 6 and 7, now in progress.

His memberships and fellowships included the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the British Academy, Phi Beta Kappa, the International Economic Association (president, 1965-68 and lifetime honorary president), the National Academy of Sciences, where he served on the Finance Committee from 1977 until 2009, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Samuelson was a distinguished lecturer at more than 20 colleges, universities and professional societies, and received 35 honorary degrees.

He is survived by his wife of 28 years, Risha Samuelson; six children from his first marriage to the late Marion Crawford Samuelson: Jane Samuelson Raybould, of London; Marnie Crawford Samuelson, of Brookline, Mass.; William Samuelson and his wife, Susan, of Belmont, Mass.; Robert Samuelson and his wife, Kristin, of Boston; John Samuelson and his wife, Gail, of Sherborn, Mass.; and Paul Samuelson and his wife, Martha, of Newton, Mass; and a stepdaughter, Susan Miller, of Lexington, Mass. He is also survived by 15 grandchildren. 

In lieu of flowers, the family requests that donations be made to the Massachusetts Audubon Society, 208 South Great Road, Lincoln, MA 01793.

Funeral arrangements will be private. A memorial service will be held at MIT at a future date, and the MIT News Office will release details as they become available.
November 15

最漫长的一天

今天,百感交集
今天,委屈之极
 
所以动心忍性,
曾益其所不能.
一言成谶
 
然后,笑笑
于是,笑笑
 
July 12

5.12地震周月祭忆

5.12汶川地震过去整整两月的今天,我突然有想写点什么的冲动。就怕时间久了,时光抹去了那些清晰的祭忆。
此处,天灾人祸,为祭忆,是为祭奠之忆。先吃饭...
March 14

低迷时期房地产大佬的表情

楼市从不缺乏表情,但因为丰收的喜悦,足以掩盖笑脸背后任何的真实。除非遇到927之后这样的天干岁寒,你才能在一颦一笑、一叹一息中,感到真实的喜怒哀乐。

那些笑容在抖-发展商集体相

楼市不乏表情,但你很难看到主演的真正心情,诚如电影,那些拿捏到极致的身段是一种,演员本身的心情是第二种。两两组合,仪态万千,所以楼市一直看不穿。比如,楼市一片莺歌艳舞,恰可能正遭遇回款的压力,某知名品牌横行江湖时,可能其正不知名,又拿消费者为例,空军唱空一片幸灾乐祸,但目的为了买,多军嘴里都是一片红,但目的在于清仓。所以纵观过去两年,楼市表情就是十里上海滩。

但这一次我的确看到了那些笑容在抖。抖非拐点和无拐点,那些都是嘴边随口话和障眼法。真正体现开发商在抖的,是大部分以现金流模式为主视土地为存单的开发商,停止了大肆拿地行为,一切视土地储备为战略重点的开发商,把存地清仓当作新的战略方向。

这说明调控真的有效,调控并非要让楼市崩盘,在我的观点里,现金流模式丧失市场,足以引发楼市良性,零七一个冬天的影像,足以将楼市改变方向。

新的市场时期,机会与威胁并存,无论大小强弱,考验都是一致的。今日且以我笔为向导,再去看看昨日朋友,他们今天的表现怎么样。

藏锋——万科

你甚至难以感受到万科的笑容,因为她的心机藏得太深。除了华夏时报那篇报道之外,除了你把万科王石和成都万科混淆的部分外。单从成都万科来看,她从来不秀规模、速度、大牌、实力,所以除了楼盘产品的信息之外,楼市鲜有关于成都万科企业的声音。乃至郑平先生可以肆意以《万科营销锋无力》来为地产商征战祭刀。

但就零七年成都万科潜出的营销锋芒来看,她已经遥遥领先,甚至令对手无从察觉。并非什么金域蓝湾或西岭,那都是普通中高端楼盘的打法。两件事情足以证明万科掩藏不住的锋芒,一件是星房族,一件是青年置业计划。从影响力来看,两者并非同等重量事件,但两者共同的一致性,就是已经摆脱楼盘秀地段、产品、案名、包装、炒作、性价的初阶阶段。不忽悠不夸张不欺骗,而是从客户需求入手,大量走货。

虽然玩信息不对称、产品配比卖货、价值夸张、客户需求,都是为了卖货,但成都万科07年的两大事件,是楼市首次尊重消费者的体现。让我看到房地产营销走出毫无技术含量的困境,可以和汽车、服装、快销品等有百年智慧积淀的行业靠拢的希望。

且让我把楼市领导者的一票,投给成都万科。

肥胖——中海

“别墅年”是中海近期干得最漂亮的一票,并给自己定位于中高端产品供应商,一度让我敬佩有加。中海旗下,因为名城、格林威治,的确在生活价值、产品质量、物业服务上,占到头筹。很长一段时间,擅长于政治游戏的媒体,都将中海排到首位。但零七年的中海,却老是在产品品质上爆出客户不信耐之光,诸如常青藤社区、国际社区别墅绿化等。之后龙湾上阵,兰亭操作,翠屏湾上阵,虽然不能叫差,但有失老大水准,坐吃山空。

楼盘操作手法无非三三两两,具体项目,并不能充分证明中海在老大的位置上睡觉。但在其岁末表现,充分证明了肥胖在于不运动的生命真理。针对90户型的降价,恐怕鲜有人记得,不是万科,而是中海国际的C-HOUSE,但一个是叫座叫好,一个是降价了客户投诉了,但没有捞到任何FANS。

最近我特别关注HP,作为商用笔记本的中上品牌,在进行收购康柏等一系列运作之后,应该是全球最N的IT商,地位不亚于通信里的移动。在+HP战略全面巩固地位之后,他近期又推出了很涂鸦的营销,不但没有严肃的IT特色,甚至连HP风格都没有了。

可见客户力量之大,如果含着奶瓶的人是你的客户,即便是HP,也必须得一身奶味去打扮自己。HP为什么如此果断大胆,可能是他不会忘记旗下的康柏。在二十年前,那可是超越IBM的IT老大啊。

晚春——龙湖

成都真的是龙湖的福地,一直没让她感受到失意。当然,这取决于龙湖在全国化之前,准备工作就做得很清楚。拿什么样的地,产品配方,营销手法,乃至公共关系,模式成熟,游刃有余。盛传体制外招到龙湖的人,都不太适应,可能这些聪明才华的职业者,都不明白龙湖需要的不是他们发挥才华,而是把龙湖的套路做好的道理。

但市场的冰冷不因龙湖的模式成熟而例外。恰是因为模式的限制,让龙湖在这次市场变革时,一点作为都没有。非但没有借势走货,也没有捞到亲近百姓顺应变革的美名。所以春节一过,龙湖七盘齐推,在过去时期整天憾地的手法,显得颇为过时。试看当初以规模论打天下的中海,以现金流模式打天下的蓝光,以品牌强势介入的粤系开发商,今天他们在做什么?至少没以昨日手法,来面对新的市场。能够做七盘联动的开发商很多,比如中海万科蓝光,但如今只有正成之类还在用,没料到龙湖海做得那么有滋有味。

都是迟钝,中海和龙湖,却是两种根源,一个为名所困,一个做框自缚。不知道零八年,成都还会不会让龙湖继续客至如归的幸福。

诡异——蓝光

蓝光在开发商排名中,一直属于主流,但骨子里的蓝光,只是开发商的另类。第一,其它大佬都有很强的开发商痕迹,但蓝光更像生意人;第二,所有大品牌都有消费者主张,但蓝光的品牌并非来自客户感受,而是来自于它的成功,恰如“我是怎么上来的不重要,重要的是我已经上来”。如果说万科的青年置业计划是阶段性举措,蓝光的首房计划,是上了瘾的行为,不但一个楼盘接一个楼盘的做,还快感十分。

蓝光的诡异,在于除了赚钱之外,他并无模式所困。所以在新的市场阶段,颇有斩获,颇有心得。

世外——中铁瑞城

去年曾在业界传得沸沸扬扬的一条信息,中铁二局城市运营——中铁瑞城战略。虽然大多数人将其当作一条企业炒作新闻,并且,中铁二局因其国企背景,并不为市场化多年的其它企业当回事。但是,中铁瑞城在今年即将实体化,变成一个可以抵御任何市场风险,不在政策束缚内的超级大物,关于他将对房地产模式产生的影响,我暂时难以定论,因为现在的房地产模式,找不到一个适合界定他价值的词语。

实体化的中铁瑞城,将包含十个以上的房地产项目,以及若干城市运营项目,产业链条几乎囊括了全部地产类别,且其重要身份,是“开发商的开发商”,就这个意义来讲,不管其它开发商多么强悍,大家不在一个重量级别。对于大多数被门槛所限的中小开发商,除了找国土局之外,也可以投奔中铁瑞城门下。
February 28

不太想写字了:(

暂时是不想写字的了,因为俺有点偏执的认为在blog上面写字来宣泄情绪不过是当众自慰的行为艺术,貌似有人说:幸福的交欢通常是在温暖私密的幕后进行的(敬业且独具奉献精神的色情片从业人员除外)。由此特羡慕那些长期不更新blog的同学们,由此可见我百无聊赖写blog的生活多么悲惨,由此也更加坚定了我伪装幸福的决心。

突然想起一句话:没有故事要讲的人,才是最幸福的人。词儿真绝。。。。。。

中国股市下跌才是正途--引致唐学鹏

  中国股市遭遇“替代”和“分流”  

  股市估值需要接受其他资本品替代效应的挑战  
  
  经受天量“解禁股”和“再融资计划”冲击的中国股市终于在监管层的不断安抚下获得“回暖”。被市场口诛笔伐,视为恶性圈钱,当作此轮股市暴跌导火索的平 安保险千亿再融资计划被“延期”,而另外一个替罪羊“浦发银行10亿股再融资计划”据说将有较大幅度的缩减。2月25日,证监会明确表态认为“上市公司再 融资是资本市场的重要功能,是市场实现资源优化配置的重要方式之一,但绝不应是恶意圈钱行为。上市公司应慎重考虑投资者的承受能力。”再加上监管部门最近 大力放行新基金,这些传统而又标志性的动作很自然地被解读为“政策底”的形成。于是,2月27日,沪指大涨95.87点,报收4334.05,结束了5连 阴的颓势。

  A股市场这一“回暖”注定是短暂性的,它的命运是继续下跌。实际上,目前A股市场迷漫着过度的非理性情绪,一厢情愿的幻想,政策救市的传统智慧以及寻找“替罪羊”的怒火,往往冷静理性的分析会被扣上各种难以自辩的“帽子”,标上居心叵测的动机。

   “解禁股”和“再融资”带来的冲击首先证明了投资者对股票的无限供应特性估计不足。股票不比钞票,钞票的发行要受到“反通胀”哲学的限制,而股票的发行 却没有这个问题,所以在西方成熟市场,股票“无限供应”的弹性对应的股票发行是低市盈率和低发行价。但长期以来,中国的股票发行采取的是“供应量的控 制”,即发行很少的股票,制造股价繁荣,比如中国石油的总股本是1830亿股,但现在的实际流通A股是30亿股,只占总股本1.64%。工商银行的总股本 是3340亿股,流通A股是91亿股,只占总股本2.7%。中国人寿的总股本是282亿,实际流通股本只有8亿,只占总股本3.2%。而这一长期的控制性 的做法造成了一种长期性的错觉,使得投资者养成了一种在“相对的供应控制的阶段”的投资眼光,而股权分置改革恰恰改变了这种相对供应控制,一旦大量股票解 禁,高股价无法抵御这一“无限供应”的风险,因为股改里并不存在“供应量的协议”。

  在国内,股票市场正在越来越猛烈地接受债券市场带 来的“资金分流”的挑战。一般而言,债券有利息,股票有分红,但股票有“转手买卖”和“控制权收益”,于是,在息率上,债券高于股票2-3点是正常的。但 如果息差继续扩大,就会造成资金主体对风险和收益的重新估算。现在,中国上市公司总体分红水平停止上升的概率越来越大,上市公司的息率水平只有1.1% (如果考虑投资者在高印花税后的交易成本,净息率更低),它面对的是信用债已经突破6%水平以上的债券市场,这种扩大的息差必定造成资金的分流和投资主体 价值坐标的重新设定。

  境外市场泡沫破灭不仅对国内股市有向下拖动作用,同时也产生越来越强烈的替代和比较效应。平安的融资计划仅仅被 肤浅地解释为“圈钱”,或者用可怕的民族主义腔调进行“侮辱”(将平安勾勒为汇丰附庸,尽管汇丰占其A+H股的总股本的16.78%,但却将汇丰说成是控 制48%的大股东,融资是为了弥补汇丰在次贷上的亏损),而没有做理性的考察。平安融资行动恰恰反映的是它利用境内外两个市场不同的市盈率和估值进行合理 “套利”:国内泡沫太高,可以融钱,而境外资产便宜,则可以收购,这样可以提升企业价值。精明的平安的“套利”举动反映了中国资产在全球资产池里面的命 运:它目前还是高估的;它的命运是减持。

  基本的规律有如天道运行,恢恢而无误。即使日后中国真的降低印花税税率(或改为单边征收); 将QDII转向回投,增大资金面;在大小非解禁比较密集时期,调配好新股发行的节奏;对待上市公司的再融资申请,掌握好审批节奏与额度等等都无法阻挡中国 股市资产的基本命运。中国股市估值不能跟自己的过去峰值比(认为现在跌幅已经剔除了泡沫),而是在其他资本品的替代和全球市场坐标下寻找属于自己的合理位 置。

  引致21世纪经济报评论员 唐学鹏
December 03

公开答辩

公元二零零七年十一月二十日下午四点
那天,是抽签公开答辩的日子,据说公开答辩的硕士十个要挂七个。
从图书馆拿到自己的硕士论文定稿,一路行来,都是压抑的人群。
朋友说出去走走吧,于是骑车到街上瞎逛。
在草堂门外,朋友接到了我宿舍那个猩猩的电话,不免嘀咕一句:为什么不直接打给你呢?
那刹那,我看见她脸色变了下,我听见自己心蹦了下~~~~
猩猩说抽到其他人了,我们有种如释重负的感觉。
想来真是悲哀~论文答辩多正常的事情,偏偏心虚。
我不想说学校的教学有无失败,起码我承认我对学校的教学是不感冒的,而且,历来如此,并坚持“不屑”。
我承认:
1、我很开心,但没幸灾乐祸;
2、衷心祝阿朱,吕帅、海生顺利通过;
3、我把宿舍的猩猩“搓”了顿,那天二舍五楼的类人猿的嚎叫是我“演奏”的。
September 05

吾国吾市吾视

  夫寰球之东方也,有国名中华焉。
  国中有股市者,其龄计有一十七岁也。
  载沉载浮,其亡也速也;肉生白骨,其兴也忽焉。
  夫巨无霸者,宇内之巨擘,东方之银窖欤。
  象体伟态,群雄蹑伏;弹指威刚,笑傲彼岸,颇具华族之象征也。
  道曰:大象无形,大音稀声,大方无隅也。其久伏潜龙,焉不得离渊而起耶?
  若乎韬养之际, 抑爪曲须, 含颈收尾, 蜿延长蛇也.
  其发之势,矫若飞龙,怒若奔雷,恰似浙潮方举,万马将腾,非凡俗所能挡之乎.
  是故领袖群伦, 显大国之雄风; 俯首涵虚, 颇具王者之仪态也.
  至若开疆僻土, 非之莫属; 攻城克寨, 岂有二乎?
  无霸威名, 方响宇宙, 能乘而随之者, 能不增闻广见, 拈币于囊而悦然于心乎?
  是有斯言.   
May 21

沉痛悼念高鸿业先生——一个人的纪念(转)

   
 
2007年5月20日 晴    
5月花开,噩耗如灾。仿照鲁迅《纪念刘和珍君》,写了下面的文字。
   
公元2007年5月20日,也就是中国人民大学经济学院教授高鸿业先生逝世的第三天,我独在办公室里读论文,收到一刹春的邮件,直接问我,“为什么论坛没有组织一些纪念文章?”我说“我现在不管论坛事务了”。他就劝诫我,“你还是写一篇吧,网友以前就很关注你的帖子。”
        我知道,凡我写的帖子,大概是因为常常表达了对现行经济学教育的不满,因此点击率一向还比较高。我也觉得在BBS一片沉寂的情况下,确实应该写一个帖子了,这显然对逝者毫无助益,但对学生,也许还能起到一点启发作用,仅此而已。倘使我的纪念帖子能和其他反思中国经济学教育的文章一起,引起掌权者的重视,那自然可以得到更大的安慰,——但是,现在,这似乎是痴心妄想。
        可是我实在无话可说。我只觉得国内大部分经济类文章并非真正的经济学。上百种经济类核心期刊,充斥着学校图书馆,使我难以卒读,哪里还能看到什么有价值的理论?研究经济学,是必须学精了之后的。而目前高校所谓学术论文和科研项目的规定,尤使我觉得悲哀。我已经不单是愤青了。我将深味这非学术的僵化的体制;以我的最大浪费显示于非学术,使它们快意于我的堕落,就将这作为后学们的微弱的警告,奉献于逝者的灵前。
  二
  真的经济学者,敢于直面微薄的报酬,敢于正视权力的影响。这是怎样的真学者和假学者?然而制度又常常为外行所设计,以指标的考核,来捍卫他们的既得利益,仅使真正的学者留下不多的论著和穷酸的遗产。在这不多的论著和穷酸的遗产中,又让假学者大行其道,维持着这似学术非学术的经济学教育。我不知道这样的经济学教育何时是一个尽头!
然则我还在这样的环境下教着;我也早觉得有写一点东西的必要了。离高先生入土为安的日子还有几天,忘却的救主应该还没有降临罢,这正是写一点东西的时候了。
  在我所有的经济学老师中,高鸿业先生可算是我的启蒙老师。老师云者,我向来这样想,这样说,现在却觉得有些踌躇了,我应该对他奉献我的悲哀与惭愧。悲哀是因为他被一个时代所扭曲和误读,惭愧是因为我没有学到他高尚的人格。
  他的姓名第一次为我所见,是在1998年我在大二学《西方经济学》时,用的就是他主编的教材。当时,多数高校的西经教材都用的是高鸿业版。但是我一直无缘得以一睹真人风采。2004年,我去人大资料楼给博士生面试作记录,一个学生指着一个人对我说,那就是高鸿业。那时我才能将姓名和真人联系起来,心中却无比诧异。我一向以为著名学者应该是鹤发童颜、仙风道骨的,但他却一脸憔悴,腰佝偻得厉害。他问我627房间在哪里,我告诉他在西边。我想过去搀扶他一下,却被他谢绝了,态度很坚定。直到听到他驾鹤归西,我一直都没有再见过他。总之,在我的记忆上,那一次就是永别了。
  四
  我在17日晚上主持师门每周例行的两次讨论会时,确认了高先生去世的消息;接着有人告诉我,竟然还有人在网上对逝者进行人身攻击。但我对于这个消息,竟至于颇为怀疑。我向来是不惮以最无聊的角度,来看待网上的评论的,然而我还不料,也不信竟会下有人无耻到这地步。况且始终为中国经济学教育做出贡献的高鸿业先生,更何至于在死后仍然被人侮辱呢?
  然而当晚我上网查看后证明是事实了,作证的便是某些网站的帖子。还有一帖居然指责高先生对西经的评论“不伦不类,不懂装懂”。这不但无知,简直就是无耻之极!高先生尸骨未寒,居然就有人在这个时候进行恶毒的攻击。
  但支持这类言论的人就是不少,他们的漠然和删贴就是明证。
  紧接着就有各种流言,说高先生的教材漏洞百出。
  噩耗,已使我备感悲恸了;流言,尤使我惨不忍睹。我还有什么话可说呢?我懂得我们这一代出不了大师的缘由了。狂妄呵,狂妄呵!不在狂妄中变坏,就在狂妄中变态。
  五
  但是,我还有要说的话。
  高先生不让弟子给他做寿,搞什么“纪念xx从教xx年”。因为他说他这辈子没有贡献,最怕过生日了。真正有贡献的人,像李冰父子那样,不需要过生日,每年也会有记住他们。
    高先生也拒绝接受什么“大师”、“泰斗”之类的桂冠,他说他别的本事没有,但是自知之明还是有的。
    高先生在80多岁的高龄,还每个月去国图看新来的外文书刊。他说不看总觉得少了点什么。
  如此具有伟岸人格的高先生终于还是去世了,给后学者留下了一些教材和文章。若干年后,当我们回首自己学习现代经济学的历程时,当我们面对积贫积弱的教育体制时,当我们面对体制内的种种压力时,当我们一度想放弃传播经济学的宏愿时,我们想想高鸿业先生,会理解他是多么的不容易!
  然而网上的一些人居然口含天宪般居高临下对高先生大加挞伐……
  六
  时间永是流驶,中国依旧和谐,有限的几个经济学家,是改变不了中国落后的经济学教育的,至多,不过供无恶意的记者做妖魔化的谈资,或者给有恶意的闲人作“意识形态”的种子。至于此外的深的意义,我总觉得很寥寥,因为这实在不过是唐吉诃德式的奋斗。中国向一个民主法治国家的前进,正如煤的形成,当时用大量的木材,结果却只是一小块,但不知道经济学教育是不是在其中,更何况是受到意识形态控制的经济学教育。
  然而既然政府已经确认要建立现代市场经济,当然不能开历史倒车。撇开意识形态的问题不论,至少,也当在现代经济学教育中鼓励数学和计量工具的使用;如此,则那些为传播现代经济学做出贡献的先行者和后学者,也会在微漠的悲哀中得到一丝慰藉和希望。马克思说过,“一种科学只有成功的运用数学时,才算达到了真正完善的地步。”倘能如此,也还不错了。
  七
  我从钦佩高鸿业先生到特别钦佩高鸿业先生,是始于自己开始执教经济学的。虽然刚工作半年,但是在比较并使用了各种初级的西经教材之后,才体会到高鸿业版教材体系之完善,逻辑之清晰,内容之适用于中国学生。在进入中国特色的教育和科研体制之内后,经受了官僚和贫困的待遇,每每有“拔剑四顾心茫然”的心态时,不禁深深地为高先生的百折不挠和高风亮节所折服。至于这一回高先生在网上得到敬重和遭人指摘,希望能引起我们后学者对现行经济学教育科研体制和青年人为人处世态度的反思。倘要寻求高先生逝世对于将来的意义,意义就在此罢。
  后学者在这僵化的体制中,会依稀看见微茫的希望;真的经济学者,将更奋然而前行。
  呜呼,我说不出话,但以此记念高鸿业先生!
供稿:白鲨在线_聂辉华官方主页_www.mdn.cn/baisha
 
Photo 1 of 57

My Custom Part